PortfoliosLab logo
LKOR vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LKOR and ^GSPC is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LKOR vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LKOR:

0.12

^GSPC:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

LKOR:

0.37

^GSPC:

1.09

Omega Ratio

LKOR:

1.05

^GSPC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

LKOR:

0.10

^GSPC:

0.72

Martin Ratio

LKOR:

0.50

^GSPC:

2.74

Ulcer Index

LKOR:

4.92%

^GSPC:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

LKOR:

11.48%

^GSPC:

19.62%

Max Drawdown

LKOR:

-36.40%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

LKOR:

-21.95%

^GSPC:

-3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKOR achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 1.30% return.


LKOR

YTD

-0.08%

1M

0.60%

6M

-1.59%

1Y

1.70%

5Y*

-2.47%

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

1.30%

1M

12.79%

6M

1.49%

1Y

12.35%

5Y*

15.12%

10Y*

10.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LKOR vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKOR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LKOR is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LKOR is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LKOR is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LKOR is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LKOR is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LKOR is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LKOR vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LKOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKOR and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

LKOR vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKOR drawdown since its inception was -36.40%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKOR and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LKOR vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) is 3.19%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that LKOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...